<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Define Look Alike Logos – Inspiration or Duplication?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DTG Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>DTG Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/?p=25#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>When is a logo NOT a logo? What does it have to do in order to BE a logo? Or, does it just matter how much money the owner of the logo has to throw at it in order for it to become instantly recognizable??? 

Anyone here ever heard of Paul Rand? 
http://www.graphic-design.com/DTG/Design/logos/rand_on_logos.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is a logo NOT a logo? What does it have to do in order to BE a logo? Or, does it just matter how much money the owner of the logo has to throw at it in order for it to become instantly recognizable??? </p>
<p>Anyone here ever heard of Paul Rand?<br />
<a href="http://www.graphic-design.com/DTG/Design/logos/rand_on_logos.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.graphic-design.com/DTG/Design/logos/rand_on_logos.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irish</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/?p=25#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>wow, thanks for sharing the ideas. plz do visit my blog and your opinion will be very appreciated. Thnx, looking forward to be your friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, thanks for sharing the ideas. plz do visit my blog and your opinion will be very appreciated. Thnx, looking forward to be your friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/?p=25#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I think many of these are just examples of companies/designers that didn't do their research well enough before going out with a logo. There are literally thousands of logos created daily, and it is more than likely that once in a while two people create two logos that look alike without ever seeing each others work.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of these are just examples of companies/designers that didn&#8217;t do their research well enough before going out with a logo. There are literally thousands of logos created daily, and it is more than likely that once in a while two people create two logos that look alike without ever seeing each others work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VQ</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>VQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/?p=25#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I have to disagree on most of these assessments though.

1. Although Quark should definitely have checked this out beforehand, I doubt this was an out and out copy. This is a really simply shape, and a form I've seen in place of a "Q" many times.

2. In this case, I think the forms differences (number of lines, corner and end shapes, length) paired with the fact that it's really just a stylized "a" are enough justification for this not being intellectual piggybacking.

3. Sun's logo is clearly different than Columbia's. Justin explained it quite well.

9. I don't think the shiny blue oval is enough to even show inspiration on the part of one of the designers. An oval is a pretty common shape, and blue a pretty common color. And as far as the shine is concerned, who the heck isn't shining their logos up these days?

Sorry to be a pain, these are just my opinions. Thanks again for the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I have to disagree on most of these assessments though.</p>
<p>1. Although Quark should definitely have checked this out beforehand, I doubt this was an out and out copy. This is a really simply shape, and a form I&#8217;ve seen in place of a &#8220;Q&#8221; many times.</p>
<p>2. In this case, I think the forms differences (number of lines, corner and end shapes, length) paired with the fact that it&#8217;s really just a stylized &#8220;a&#8221; are enough justification for this not being intellectual piggybacking.</p>
<p>3. Sun&#8217;s logo is clearly different than Columbia&#8217;s. Justin explained it quite well.</p>
<p>9. I don&#8217;t think the shiny blue oval is enough to even show inspiration on the part of one of the designers. An oval is a pretty common shape, and blue a pretty common color. And as far as the shine is concerned, who the heck isn&#8217;t shining their logos up these days?</p>
<p>Sorry to be a pain, these are just my opinions. Thanks again for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erica</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/look-alike-logos/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/?p=25#comment-75</guid>
		<description>you really need to learn how to write a more interesting article instead of just posting pictures and being like 'hey! they look the same!'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you really need to learn how to write a more interesting article instead of just posting pictures and being like &#8216;hey! they look the same!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
